People v. Rutledge

202 A.D.2d 1021, 610 N.Y.S.2d 920, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3398
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Rutledge. Read the opinion of the Court — 179 A.D.2d 404

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Upon examination of this record, we conclude that the verdict is not against the weight of the evidence (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495). Defendant failed to preserve for our review his contention that prosecutorial misconduct on summation deprived him of a fair trial (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Goldman, 197 AD2d 906). In any event, there is no merit to that contention. Further, we conclude that the sentence imposed is neither unduly harsh nor severe. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Forma, J. — Murder, 2nd Degree.) Present —Denman, P. J., Balio, Lawton, Fallon and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Rutledge, 202 A.D.2d 1021, 610 N.Y.S.2d 920, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3398 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

202 A.D.2d 1021 (People v. Rutledge) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Bleakley
508 N.E.2d 672 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)
People v. Goldman
197 A.D.2d 906 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)