Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/People v. Rutledge

People v. Rutledge

202 A.D.2d 1021, 610 N.Y.S.2d 920, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3398
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 11, 1994
StatusPublished

This text of 202 A.D.2d 1021 (People v. Rutledge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Rutledge, 202 A.D.2d 1021, 610 N.Y.S.2d 920, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3398 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Upon examination of this record, we conclude that the verdict is not against the weight of the evidence (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495). Defendant failed to preserve for our review his contention that prosecutorial misconduct on summation deprived him of a fair trial (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Goldman, 197 AD2d 906). In any event, there is no merit to that contention. Further, we conclude that the sentence imposed is neither unduly harsh nor severe. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Forma, J. — Murder, 2nd Degree.) Present —Denman, P. J., Balio, Lawton, Fallon and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Bleakley
508 N.E.2d 672 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)
People v. Goldman
197 A.D.2d 906 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
202 A.D.2d 1021, 610 N.Y.S.2d 920, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3398, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-rutledge-nyappdiv-1994.