People v. Russo

60 A.D.2d 853, 400 N.Y.S.2d 584, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9876
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Russo. Read the opinion of the Court — 57 A.D.2d 578

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered December 10, 1976, convicting him of criminal possession of stolen property in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment affirmed and case remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (subd 5). The trial court was in error in denying defendant the right of recross-examination of Officer Clermont with respect to the weapons charge, in view of the fact that, for the first time on redirect, the prosecutor developed testimony thereon from the officer. However, the error was not prejudicial since the jury acquitted defendant of the weapons charge (see CPL 470.05, subd 1; People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230). Hopkins, J. P., Margett, Rabin and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Russo, 60 A.D.2d 853, 400 N.Y.S.2d 584, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9876 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1978).

60 A.D.2d 853 (People v. Russo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Crimmins
326 N.E.2d 787 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)