People v. Russell

270 A.D.2d 884, 705 N.Y.S.2d 921, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3366
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Russell. Read the opinion of the Court — 269 A.D.2d 771

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment of County Court convicting him upon his plea of guilty of murder in the first degree (Penal Law § 125.27 [1] [a] [viii]; [b]), two counts of murder in the second degree (Penal Law § 125.25 [1]), and conspiracy in the fourth degree (Penal Law § 105.10 [1]). Defendant was sentenced to concurrent terms, the highest being life imprisonment without parole.

On appeal, defendant contends that CPL 400.27 (1) is unconstitutional because it provides for a full sentencing hearing in capital cases, but not in cases where a defendant has been convicted of first degree murder but against whom the People either have not filed or have withdrawn a notice of intent to seek the death penalty. “Because defendant never raised that constitutional challenge before the sentencing court, he failed to preserve it for our review” (People v Maisonet, 265 AD2d 835). Given the brutal nature of this double murder, we decline to exercise our power to modify the sentence as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice (see, CPL 470.15 [6] [b]). (Appeal from Judgment of Genesee County Court, Griffith, J.— Murder, 1st Degree.) Present — Green, J. P., Pine, Scudder and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Russell, 270 A.D.2d 884, 705 N.Y.S.2d 921, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3366 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

270 A.D.2d 884 (People v. Russell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Maisonet
265 A.D.2d 835 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)