People v. Russell

759 N.W.2d 23, 483 Mich. 851
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Russell. Read the opinion of the Court — 482 Mich. 995
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided January 9, 2009·No. 137330·Published

Opinion

Summary Disposition January 9, 2009:

Pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we remand this case to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration of that part of the defendant’s application challenging the imposition of attorney fees in light of People v Trapp (On Remand), 280 Mich App 598 (2008). On remand, the Court of Appeals shall also consider whether any recoupment of the costs of court-appointed counsel is permissible since the record suggests that the defendant was represented by retained counsel throughout most of the trial court proceedings. In all other respects, leave to appeal is denied, because we are not persuaded that the remaining question presented should be reviewed by this Court. We do not retain jurisdiction. Court of Appeals No. 284777.

Hathaway, J., did not participate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Russell, 759 N.W.2d 23, 483 Mich. 851 (Mich. 2009).

759 N.W.2d 23 (People v. Russell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Trapp
760 N.W.2d 791 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 2008)