People v. Rush
Opinion
—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Gazzillo, J.), rendered March 29, 2002, convicting him of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s [296]*296assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]). Ritter, J.P., Feuerstein, McGinity, Townes and Cozier, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
306 A.D.2d 295 (People v. Rush) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.