People v. Rush

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Rush

11 A.D.2d 1023, 214 N.Y.S.2d 673, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7436

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 27, 1960

StatusPublished

This text of 11 A.D.2d 1023 (People v. Rush) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Rush, 11 A.D.2d 1023, 214 N.Y.S.2d 673, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7436 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion for leave to appeal as a poor person granted insofar as to permit the appeal to be heard on the original record, without printing the same, except that a certified copy of the information shall be substituted in place of the original information, and upon typewritten or mimeographed appellant’s points, on condition that the appellant serves one copy of the type-written or mimeographed appellant’s points upon the District Attorney, New York County, and files 6 typewritten or 19 mimeqgraphed copies of appellant’s points, together with the original record, [1024]*1024with this court on or before December 5, 1960, with notice of argument for the January 1961 Term of this court. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Valente and McNally, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion for leave to appeal as a poor person granted insofar as to permit the appeal to be heard on the original record, without printing the same, except that a certified copy of the information shall be substituted in place of the original information, and upon typewritten or mimeographed appellant’s points, on condition that the appellant serves one copy of the type-written or mimeographed appellant’s points upon the District Attorney, New York County, and files 6 typewritten or 19 mimeqgraphed copies of appellant’s points, together with the original record, [1024]*1024with this court on or before December 5, 1960, with notice of argument for the January 1961 Term of this court. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Valente and McNally, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

11 A.D.2d 1023, 214 N.Y.S.2d 673, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7436, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-rush-nyappdiv-1960.