People v. Rullo

292 N.E.2d 674, 31 N.Y.2d 894, 340 N.Y.S.2d 405, 1972 N.Y. LEXIS 936
New York Court of Appeals·Decided December 28, 1972·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Order affirmed in the following memorandum: Although it was error to receive in evidence during the People’s case-in-chief that portion of defendant’s Grand Jury testimony in which he acknowledged a prior conviction, such portion of the transcript of his Grand Jury testimony could have been redacted, and the error avoided, had defense counsel brought this matter to the attention of the trial court by means of a specific objection. The absence of a specific objection to the introduction of the prior conviction prevents this court from reviewing the issue. (People v. McCormick, 31 N Y 2d 807; cf. People v. Berrios, 28 N Y 2d 361, 367.)

Concur: Chief Judge Fuid and Judges Burke, Scileppi, Bergant, Bbeitel, Jasen and Gibson.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Rullo, 292 N.E.2d 674, 31 N.Y.2d 894, 340 N.Y.S.2d 405, 1972 N.Y. LEXIS 936 (N.Y. 1972).

292 N.E.2d 674 (People v. Rullo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Webster
151 A.D.2d 989 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
People v. Thompson
116 A.D.2d 377 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
People v. Guerrero
111 A.D.2d 350 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
People v. Kratky
122 Misc. 2d 949 (New York Supreme Court, 1984)
People v. Clark
41 N.Y. 612 (New York Court of Appeals, 1977)