People v. Ruise
Opinion
Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Chemung County (Hayden, J.), rendered February 3, 2014, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree.
In satisfaction of a four-count indictment, defendant pleaded guilty to criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and was sentenced as a second felony offender, in accordance with the plea agreement, to a prison term of three years, followed by two years of postrelease supervision. Defendant appeals, contending that the sentence imposed was harsh and excessive, particularly given his mental health issues. We disagree. Noting defendant’s criminal history and the favorable plea resolution, we find no abuse of discretion by County Court nor any extraordinary circumstances warranting a modification of the bargained-for sentence (see People v Nixon, *1329 98 AD3d 1169, 1169 [2012]; People v Ross, 45 AD3d 897, 897 [2007]).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
131 A.D.3d 1328 (People v. Ruise) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.