People v. Ruggiero

251 A.D.2d 685, 676 N.Y.S.2d 474, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7944
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 29, 1998
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 251 A.D.2d 685 (People v. Ruggiero) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Ruggiero, 251 A.D.2d 685, 676 N.Y.S.2d 474, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7944 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County [686]*686(Cotter, J.), rendered October 21, 1997, convicting him of assault in the second degree, assault in the third degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that he was denied the right to be present at a material stage of the trial is not reviewable since he failed to make a sufficient record in this regard (see, People v Roman, 217 AD2d 473, affd 88 NY2d 18).

In addition, the defendant’s contention that the prosecutor’s summation improperly changed the theory of the case is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05) and, in any event, without merit (see, People v Turner, 187 AD2d 469).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Miller, J. P., Thompson, Joy and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. McKanney
272 A.D.2d 629 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
251 A.D.2d 685, 676 N.Y.S.2d 474, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7944, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-ruggiero-nyappdiv-1998.