People v. Ruggieri

New York Court of Appeals

People v. Ruggieri

345 N.E.2d 581, 38 N.Y.2d 805, 382 N.Y.S.2d 38, 1975 N.Y. LEXIS 2398

DecidedDecember 29, 1975

StatusPublished

This text of 345 N.E.2d 581 (People v. Ruggieri) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Ruggieri, 345 N.E.2d 581, 38 N.Y.2d 805, 382 N.Y.S.2d 38, 1975 N.Y. LEXIS 2398 (N.Y. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

Memorandum. The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Appellant’s contentions have not been persuasive on any of [806]*806the several issues tendered, nor has he demonstrated that the record discloses the admission of illegal evidence or that there was any intrusion of confidential conferences of the defense.

Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Memorandum. The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Appellant’s contentions have not been persuasive on any of [806]*806the several issues tendered, nor has he demonstrated that the record discloses the admission of illegal evidence or that there was any intrusion of confidential conferences of the defense.

Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

345 N.E.2d 581, 38 N.Y.2d 805, 382 N.Y.S.2d 38, 1975 N.Y. LEXIS 2398, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-ruggieri-ny-1975.