People v. Ruffin
196 N.W.2d 10, 38 Mich. App. 267
This text of 196 N.W.2d 10 (People v. Ruffin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
People v. Ruffin, 196 N.W.2d 10, 38 Mich. App. 267 (Mich. Ct. App. 1972).
Opinion
Defendant pleaded guilty to assault with intent to rob while being armed and he appeals. A motion to affirm has been filed by the people.
Upon an examination of the briefs and record, it is manifest that the question sought to be reviewed is so unsubstantial as to need no argument or formal submission.
Motion to affirm is granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
196 N.W.2d 10, 38 Mich. App. 267, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-ruffin-michctapp-1972.