People v. Rudolph

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Rudolph

104 A.D.2d 1055, 480 N.Y.S.2d 883, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20499

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 29, 1984

StatusPublished

This text of 104 A.D.2d 1055 (People v. Rudolph) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Rudolph, 104 A.D.2d 1055, 480 N.Y.S.2d 883, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20499 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

— Judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Sherman, J.), rendered July 12, 1983, affirmed.

The issues raised by defendant regarding his plea are not properly before this court since defendant failed to raise them in the court of first instance (see People v Pellegrino, 60 NY2d 636). In any event, were we to address the merits we would affirm. Defendant’s claim as to his sentence lacks merit. Brown, J. P., Niehoff, Rubin and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Sherman, J.), rendered July 12, 1983, affirmed.

The issues raised by defendant regarding his plea are not properly before this court since defendant failed to raise them in the court of first instance (see People v Pellegrino, 60 NY2d 636). In any event, were we to address the merits we would affirm. Defendant’s claim as to his sentence lacks merit. Brown, J. P., Niehoff, Rubin and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

104 A.D.2d 1055, 480 N.Y.S.2d 883, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20499, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-rudolph-nyappdiv-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack