People v. Rudnick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Rudnick

259 A.D. 922, 20 N.Y.S.2d 996, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7306

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 20, 1940

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 259 A.D. 922 (People v. Rudnick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Rudnick, 259 A.D. 922, 20 N.Y.S.2d 996, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7306 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment by a city magistrate, sitting as a Court of Special Sessions of the City of New York, Borough of Brooklyn, convicting the defendant of violating section 2147 of the Penal Law (public traffic on Sunday), unanimously affirmed. The defense provided by section 2144 of the Penal Law, is not available against a violation of section 2147 of such law. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Close, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment by a city magistrate, sitting as a Court of Special Sessions of the City of New York, Borough of Brooklyn, convicting the defendant of violating section 2147 of the Penal Law (public traffic on Sunday), unanimously affirmed. The defense provided by section 2144 of the Penal Law, is not available against a violation of section 2147 of such law. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Close, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

259 A.D. 922, 20 N.Y.S.2d 996, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7306, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-rudnick-nyappdiv-1940.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack