People v. Ruddock (O'Kang)

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedNovember 21, 2017
Docket2017 NYSlipOp 51572(U)
StatusPublished

This text of People v. Ruddock (O'Kang) (People v. Ruddock (O'Kang)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Ruddock (O'Kang), (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion



The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

against

O'Kang Ruddock, Defendant-Appellant.


Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, New York County (Eugene Schwartzwald, J.H.O.), rendered October 31, 2013, after a nonjury trial, convicting him of violating Public Health Law § 229, and imposing sentence.

Per Curiam.

Judgment of conviction (Eugene Schwartzwald, J.H.O.), rendered October 31, 2013, reversed, on the law, accusatory instrument dismissed, and fine, if paid, remitted.

As the People concede, defendant's Summons Part conviction must be vacated, since the summons was insufficient to demonstrate notice of the charges against defendant.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.


I concur I concur I concur
Decision Date: November 21, 2017

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 229
New York PBH § 229

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
People v. Ruddock (O'Kang), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-ruddock-okang-nyappterm-2017.