People v. Ruckdeschel

208 A.D.3d 1597, 174 N.Y.S.3d 651, 2022 NY Slip Op 05413
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedSeptember 30, 2022
Docket618 KA 19-00701
StatusPublished

This text of 208 A.D.3d 1597 (People v. Ruckdeschel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Ruckdeschel, 208 A.D.3d 1597, 174 N.Y.S.3d 651, 2022 NY Slip Op 05413 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

People v Ruckdeschel (2022 NY Slip Op 05413)
People v Ruckdeschel
2022 NY Slip Op 05413
Decided on September 30, 2022
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on September 30, 2022 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CENTRA, LINDLEY, CURRAN, AND WINSLOW, JJ.

618 KA 19-00701

[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

v

STEPHANY RUCKDESCHEL, ALSO KNOWN AS JANE DOE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.


JILL L. PAPERNO, ACTING PUBLIC DEFENDER, ROCHESTER (JANET C. SOMES OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

SANDRA DOORLEY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (KAYLAN C. PORTER OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.



Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Alex R. Renzi, J.), rendered April 25, 2018. The judgment convicted defendant upon her plea of guilty of attempted murder in the second degree.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting her upon her plea of guilty of attempted murder in the second degree (Penal Law

§§ 110.00, 125.25 [1]), defendant contends that her waiver of the right to appeal is invalid and that her sentence is unduly harsh and severe. Even assuming, arguendo, that defendant's waiver of the right to appeal is invalid and therefore does not preclude our review of her challenge to the severity of her sentence (see People v Campbell, 196 AD3d 1064, 1064-1065 [4th Dept 2021], lv denied 37 NY3d 1026 [2021]; People v Alls, 187 AD3d 1515, 1515 [4th Dept 2020]; see generally People v Thomas, 34 NY3d 545, 565 [2019], cert denied — US &mdash, 140

S Ct 2634 [2020]), we nevertheless conclude that the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe.

Entered: September 30, 2022

Ann Dillon Flynn

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Alls
2020 NY Slip Op 05329 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
People v. Campbell
2021 NY Slip Op 04307 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
208 A.D.3d 1597, 174 N.Y.S.3d 651, 2022 NY Slip Op 05413, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-ruckdeschel-nyappdiv-2022.