People v. Rowser

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Rowser

112 A.D.2d 37, 490 N.Y.S.2d 1015, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 50681

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 4, 1985

StatusPublished

This text of 112 A.D.2d 37 (People v. Rowser) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Rowser, 112 A.D.2d 37, 490 N.Y.S.2d 1015, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 50681 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The claimed error in the court’s charge is not preserved for review and, on this record, we find no reason to reach it (see, People v Thomas, 50 NY2d 467,471). We have examined defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. (Appeal from judgment of Onondaga County Court, Cunningham, J. — burglary, second degree.) Present— Hancock, Jr., J. P., Callahan, Denman, O’Donnell and Pine, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The claimed error in the court’s charge is not preserved for review and, on this record, we find no reason to reach it (see, People v Thomas, 50 NY2d 467,471). We have examined defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. (Appeal from judgment of Onondaga County Court, Cunningham, J. — burglary, second degree.) Present— Hancock, Jr., J. P., Callahan, Denman, O’Donnell and Pine, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

112 A.D.2d 37, 490 N.Y.S.2d 1015, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 50681, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-rowser-nyappdiv-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack