People v. Rowe

216 A.D.2d 498, 628 N.Y.S.2d 558, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6448
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Rowe. Read the opinion of the Court — 227 A.D.2d 212

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Clabby, J.), rendered January 5, 1994, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, and resisting arrest, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of those branches of the defendant’s omnibus motion which were to suppress physical evidence and a statement made by him to the police.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The record supports the Supreme Court’s determination that the police officer had reasonable suspicion to seize the defendant. Consequently, those branches of the defendant’s omnibus motion which were to suppress physical evidence and a statement made by him to the police were properly denied (see, People v Bond, 116 AD2d 28, 31; People v Milton, 115 AD2d 666; People v Holmes, 81 NY2d 1056,1058). Bracken, J. P., Balletta, Rosenblatt and Altman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Rowe, 216 A.D.2d 498, 628 N.Y.S.2d 558, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6448 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

216 A.D.2d 498 (People v. Rowe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Holmes
619 N.E.2d 396 (New York Court of Appeals, 1993)
People v. Milton
115 A.D.2d 666 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
People v. Bond
116 A.D.2d 28 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)