People v. Rouse

282 A.D.2d 319, 723 N.Y.S.2d 360, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3903
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 17, 2001·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Robert Seewald, J.), rendered February 24, 1998, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of robbery in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 3 to 6 years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis upon which to disturb the jury’s determinations concerning identification and credibility. Although the victim could not make an in-court identification, his prior identification of defendant (see, CPL 60.25), as well as compelling circumstantial evidence, clearly established defendant’s identity as the perpetrator. Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Mazzarelli, Andrias, Saxe and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Rouse, 282 A.D.2d 319, 723 N.Y.S.2d 360, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3903 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

282 A.D.2d 319 (People v. Rouse) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Gordon L.
288 A.D.2d 475 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)