People v. Rouse
This text of 728 N.W.2d 457 (People v. Rouse) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
John Allen ROUSE, Defendant-Appellee.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 2, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE the judgment of the Court of Appeals, for the reasons stated in the Court of Appeals dissenting opinion, and we REINSTATE the defendant's convictions.
MARILYN J. KELLY, J., would deny leave to appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
728 N.W.2d 457, 477 Mich. 1063, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-rouse-mich-2007.