People v. Roundtree

38 A.D.3d 385, 833 N.Y.S.2d 19
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Roundtree. Read the opinion of the Court — 28 A.D.3d 1184

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Edwin Torres, J.), rendered November 15, 2005, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of robbery in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 2V2 to 5 years, unanimously affirmed.

While the court should have avoided singling out the intoxication defense as a matter upon which the jury should “proceed with caution,” the charge, viewed as a whole, conveyed the proper standards and did not deprive defendant of a fair trial (see People v Fields, 87 NY2d 821 [1995]). The court carefully instructed the jury on the People’s burden of proof, and it never suggested that defendant had any such burden (compare People v Velazquez, 77 AD2d 845 [1980], lv denied 51 NY2d 884 [1980]), or that the court had any opinion on the intoxication issue. Defendant’s argument concerning the court’s supplemental charge is unpreserved and without merit. Concur—Tom, J.E, Andrias, Sullivan, Williams and Gonzalez, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Roundtree, 38 A.D.3d 385, 833 N.Y.S.2d 19 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

38 A.D.3d 385 (People v. Roundtree) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Fields
660 N.E.2d 1134 (New York Court of Appeals, 1995)
People v. Velazquez
77 A.D.2d 845 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)