People v. Rotolo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Rotolo

134 A.D.3d 633, 21 N.Y.S.3d 612

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 29, 2015·No. 16495 2230/12·Published

Opinion

An appeal having *634 been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Gregory Carro, J.), rendered on or about April 17, 2013, said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive, it is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed. Concur— Friedman, J.P., Acosta, Andrias and Richter, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

An appeal having *634 been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Gregory Carro, J.), rendered on or about April 17, 2013, said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive, it is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed. Concur— Friedman, J.P., Acosta, Andrias and Richter, JJ.

People v. Rotolo, 134 A.D.3d 633, 21 N.Y.S.3d 612 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

134 A.D.3d 633 (People v. Rotolo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.