People v. Rossiter
4 Cow. 143
Opinion
The motion must be denied. The people are not bound by an act of this kind, unless they are named in it. The rule is the same as in England. The king is not bound by a bankrupt law unless named ;
Motion denied.
Anonymous, 1 Atk, 262. Rex v. Pixley, Bunb. 202. This question is fully examined, in reference to the statute, of limitations by Mr. Justice Story in U. States v. Hoar, (2 Mason’s Rep. 311-12, &c.) and vid. U. States v. Wilson, (8 Wheat. 253,) that a state insolvent law shall not bind the United States.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Rossiter, 4 Cow. 143 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1825).
4 Cow. 143 (People v. Rossiter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Skelly v. Westminster School District
37 P. 643 (California Supreme Court, 1894)
In re City of Utica
26 N.Y.S. 564 (New York Supreme Court, 1893)
State ex rel. Clements v. Court of Common Pleas
18 A. 118 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1889)
Hoge v. Brookover
28 W. Va. 304 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1886)
Trustees for the Support of Public Schools v. Inhabitants of Trenton
30 N.J. Eq. 667 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1879)
United States v. Tetlow
28 F. Cas. 43 (D. Massachusetts, 1872)
United States v. Hewes
26 F. Cas. 297 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1840)