People v. Rossi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Rossi

16 A.D.2d 650

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 2, 1962

StatusPublished

This text of 16 A.D.2d 650 (People v. Rossi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Rossi, 16 A.D.2d 650 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion by respondent to amend or resettle the order and the opinion or decision of this court, made on July 5, 1961 (People v. Rossi, 14 A D 2d 558) so as to indicate definitely that our reversal was on the law alone and not on the facts. Motion granted; the order and decision are resettled accordingly; and the decision is amended by striking out the statement therein that “Under all the circumstances, it is our opinion that a new trial is required in the interests of justice.” Appellant in his brief in this court raised only questions of law. This court’s decision reversing the judgment [651]*651and directing a new trial was based on questions of law only. Precisely as stated in said order and decision, the facts were not considered by this court. Beldock, P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Brennan and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion by respondent to amend or resettle the order and the opinion or decision of this court, made on July 5, 1961 (People v. Rossi, 14 A D 2d 558) so as to indicate definitely that our reversal was on the law alone and not on the facts. Motion granted; the order and decision are resettled accordingly; and the decision is amended by striking out the statement therein that “Under all the circumstances, it is our opinion that a new trial is required in the interests of justice.” Appellant in his brief in this court raised only questions of law. This court’s decision reversing the judgment [651]*651and directing a new trial was based on questions of law only. Precisely as stated in said order and decision, the facts were not considered by this court. Beldock, P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Brennan and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

16 A.D.2d 650, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-rossi-nyappdiv-1962.