People v. Rossi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Rossi

7 A.D.2d 648, 180 N.Y.S.2d 348, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4226

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 17, 1958

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 7 A.D.2d 648 (People v. Rossi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Rossi, 7 A.D.2d 648, 180 N.Y.S.2d 348, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4226 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from so much of a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County, as allowed a demurrer to the first count of an indictment, which count charged respondent with grand larceny in the first degree. Judgment insofar as appealed from reversed, demurrer to the first count disallowed, and matter remitted to the County Court for the purpose of fixing the time for respondent to plead to the first count of the indictment. The first count is sufficient to charge that the claims made by respondent as to alleged medical treatments were incidents of a single scheme within the single intent of respondent to defraud (People v. Cox, 286 N. Y. 137; People v. Daghita, 276 App. Div. 20). Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Murphy, Ughetta and Hallinan, JJ, concur. [9 Misc 2d 913.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from so much of a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County, as allowed a demurrer to the first count of an indictment, which count charged respondent with grand larceny in the first degree. Judgment insofar as appealed from reversed, demurrer to the first count disallowed, and matter remitted to the County Court for the purpose of fixing the time for respondent to plead to the first count of the indictment. The first count is sufficient to charge that the claims made by respondent as to alleged medical treatments were incidents of a single scheme within the single intent of respondent to defraud (People v. Cox, 286 N. Y. 137; People v. Daghita, 276 App. Div. 20). Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Murphy, Ughetta and Hallinan, JJ, concur. [9 Misc 2d 913.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

7 A.D.2d 648, 180 N.Y.S.2d 348, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4226, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-rossi-nyappdiv-1958.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack