People v. Ross

157 A.D.2d 808, 550 N.Y.S.2d 410, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 694
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 22, 1990·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Sherman, J.), rendered March 22, 1988, convicting him of attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The airport search of the defendant’s "carry-on luggage” by means of an X-ray machine was reasonable and constitutionally permissible given the evident danger to the public, the overwhelming governmental interest, and the minimal invasion into personal privacy (see, People v Brown, 113 AD2d 893; see also, People v Price, 54 NY2d 557, 563-564; People v Kuhn, 33 NY2d 203, 209-210). Thus, the hearing court did not err in denying the defendant’s motion to suppress the gun found in that luggage. Mollen, P. J., Mangano, Thompson and Brown, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Ross, 157 A.D.2d 808, 550 N.Y.S.2d 410, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 694 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

157 A.D.2d 808 (People v. Ross) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Spalding
3 Misc. 3d 1052 (Criminal Court of the City of New York, 2004)
People v. Waring
174 A.D.2d 16 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)