People v. Ross (Gary)
This text of People v. Ross (Gary) (People v. Ross (Gary)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
against
Gary Ross, Defendant-Appellant.
Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, New York County (Robert M. Mandelbaum, J.), rendered March 20, 2013, after a nonjury trial, convicting him of sexual abuse in the third degree, and imposing sentence.
Per Curiam.
Judgment of conviction (Robert M. Mandelbaum, J.), rendered March 20, 2013, affirmed.
The verdict convicting defendant of third degree sexual abuse (see Penal Law § 130.55) was supported by legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the court's determination concerning credibility. The victim's testimony, which was credited by the court, established that defendant - who was lying on a stretcher and receiving hospital discharge instructions - raised his upper body off the stretcher, extended his left arm and grabbed the victim's right breast. The court could rationally infer that defendant's conduct was for the purpose of sexual gratification, as defined by Penal Law § 130.00(3), and was not inadvertent (see People v Wagner, 72 AD3d 1196, 1197 [2010], lv denied 15 NY3d 779 [2010]; People v Sumpter, 190 Misc 2d 115 [2001], lv denied 97 NY2d 762 [2002]).
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.
I concur I concur I concur
Decision Date: October 25, 2016
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
People v. Ross (Gary), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-ross-gary-nyappterm-2016.