People v. Roshan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Roshan

262 A.D.2d 587, 691 N.Y.S.2d 333, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7078

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 21, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 262 A.D.2d 587 (People v. Roshan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Roshan, 262 A.D.2d 587, 691 N.Y.S.2d 333, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7078 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (DeRiggi, J.), rendered April 14, 1998, convicting her of criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree, upon her plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The decision to grant youthful offender status lies within the sound discretion of the trial court (see, People v Wallace, 246 [588]*588AD2d 676; People v Vera, 206 AD2d 494; People v Barr, 168 AD2d 625). The County Court’s determination to deny youthful offender treatment to the defendant was not an improvident exercise of discretion. Bracken, J. P., Thompson, Goldstein, McGinity and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (DeRiggi, J.), rendered April 14, 1998, convicting her of criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree, upon her plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The decision to grant youthful offender status lies within the sound discretion of the trial court (see, People v Wallace, 246 [588]*588AD2d 676; People v Vera, 206 AD2d 494; People v Barr, 168 AD2d 625). The County Court’s determination to deny youthful offender treatment to the defendant was not an improvident exercise of discretion. Bracken, J. P., Thompson, Goldstein, McGinity and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

262 A.D.2d 587, 691 N.Y.S.2d 333, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7078, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-roshan-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack