People v. Rosenfeld

187 A.D.2d 965
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 18, 1992
DocketAppeal No. 2
StatusPublished

This text of 187 A.D.2d 965 (People v. Rosenfeld) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Rosenfeld, 187 A.D.2d 965 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Upon our review of the record, we conclude that the verdict is not against the weight of the evidence (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495). Defendant has failed to preserve for our review his contention that he was deprived of a fair trial by the cumulative effect of improper comments made by the prosecutor during summation (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Dawson, 50 NY2d 311, 324; People v Dunn, 158 AD2d 941, lv denied 76 NY2d 734) and we decline to review the issue in the interest of justice (see, CPL 470.15 [6] [a]). (Appeal from Judgment of Onondaga County [966]*966Court, Burke, J. — Sodomy, 1st Degree.) Present — Denman, P. J., Green, Balio, Boehm and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Dawson
406 N.E.2d 771 (New York Court of Appeals, 1980)
People v. Bleakley
508 N.E.2d 672 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)
People v. Dunn
158 A.D.2d 941 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
187 A.D.2d 965, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-rosenfeld-nyappdiv-1992.