People v. Rosencrantz
This text of 676 N.W.2d 211 (People v. Rosencrantz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Timothy Ray ROSENCRANTZ, Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 3, 2003 order *212 of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
MARILYN J. KELLY, J., states as follows:
I concur in the denial of the application for leave to appeal because the issues raised by the defendant in his motion for relief from judgment, including the allegations raised in the January 27, 2000 affidavit, were previously reviewed by this Court and disposed of by order dated January 15, 2002, in Docket No. 119741, and no further relief may be granted on these issues. MCR 6.508(D)(2).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
676 N.W.2d 211, 469 Mich. 1020, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-rosencrantz-mich-2004.