People v. Rosencrantz

676 N.W.2d 211, 469 Mich. 1020
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided March 19, 2004·No. 124370, COA No. 245432·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

676 N.W.2d 211 (2004)
469 Mich. 1020

PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Timothy Ray ROSENCRANTZ, Defendant-Appellant.

Docket No. 124370, COA No. 245432.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

March 19, 2004.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 3, 2003 order *212 of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).

MARILYN J. KELLY, J., states as follows:

I concur in the denial of the application for leave to appeal because the issues raised by the defendant in his motion for relief from judgment, including the allegations raised in the January 27, 2000 affidavit, were previously reviewed by this Court and disposed of by order dated January 15, 2002, in Docket No. 119741, and no further relief may be granted on these issues. MCR 6.508(D)(2).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Rosencrantz, 676 N.W.2d 211, 469 Mich. 1020 (Mich. 2004).

676 N.W.2d 211 (People v. Rosencrantz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Griffith v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
697 N.W.2d 895 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2005)