People v. Rosell

Michigan Court of Appeals

People v. Rosell

171 N.W.2d 2, 18 Mich. App. 322, 1969 Mich. App. LEXIS 1068

CourtMichigan Court of Appeals

DecidedJuly 28, 1969

DocketDocket No. 5,538

StatusPublished

This text of 171 N.W.2d 2 (People v. Rosell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Rosell, 171 N.W.2d 2, 18 Mich. App. 322, 1969 Mich. App. LEXIS 1068 (Mich. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Defendant Enrique Acea Rosell was charged with having committed the act of sodomy in violation of MCLA § 750.158 (Stat Ann 1962 Rev § 28.355), in 1966 in the city of Detroit. He was tried by the court without a jury on October 6, 1967, and found guilty.

The appeal tests the sufficiency of the evidence for a finding of guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. The people file a motion to affirm the conviction.

A review of defendant’s brief, the motion to affirm, and the record discloses sufficient evidence to sustain the conviction, if such testimony were believed by the trial court.

Accordingly, the motion to affirm is granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI