People v. Rose

2016 NY Slip Op 8940, 145 A.D.3d 630, 42 N.Y.S.3d 826
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Rose. Read the opinion of the Court — 120 A.D.3d 593
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 29, 2016·No. 2552 8207/87·Published

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Arlene D. Goldberg, J.), entered September 17, 2015, which adjudicated defendant a level two sexually violent sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court properly exercised its discretion when it declined to grant a downward departure (see People v Gillotti, 23 NY3d 841 [2014]). The mitigating factors cited by defendant were adequately taken into account by the risk assessment instrument or outweighed by the seriousness of the underlying crime and defendant’s violent criminal history.

Concur—Acosta, J.P., Renwick, Andrias, Saxe and Gische, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Rose, 2016 NY Slip Op 8940, 145 A.D.3d 630, 42 N.Y.S.3d 826 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

2016 NY Slip Op 8940 (People v. Rose) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Gillotti
18 N.E.3d 701 (New York Court of Appeals, 2014)