People v. Rose
This text of 47 A.D.3d 848 (People v. Rose) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Konviser, J.), rendered May 26, 2005, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant’s contentions concerning the prosecutor’s remarks during summation are unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Gillespie, 36 AD3d 626 [2007]) and, in any event, are without merit.
[849]*849Furthermore, since the prosecutor’s remarks during summation were proper, the defendant’s contention that he received ineffective counsel based solely upon a failure to object to the prosecutor’s summation is without merit. Spolzino, J.P., Ritter, Miller and Dickerson, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
47 A.D.3d 848, 849 N.Y.S.2d 158, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-rose-nyappdiv-2008.