People v. Rose

251 A.D.2d 604, 673 N.Y.S.2d 940, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7459

This text of 251 A.D.2d 604 (People v. Rose) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Rose, 251 A.D.2d 604, 673 N.Y.S.2d 940, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7459 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme County, Queens County (Corrado, J.), rendered June 6, 1995, convicting him of murder in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

There was no violation of Batson v Kentucky (476 US 79) in this case (see, People v Durant, 250 AD2d 698).

Moreover, contrary to the defendant’s claim, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). ,

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]) or without merit. Rosenblatt, J. P., Miller, Ritter and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Batson v. Kentucky
476 U.S. 79 (Supreme Court, 1986)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
People v. Durant
250 A.D.2d 698 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
251 A.D.2d 604, 673 N.Y.S.2d 940, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7459, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-rose-nyappdiv-1998.