People v. Rose
This text of 178 A.D. 952 (People v. Rose) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment of conviction affirmed. Held, that the remarks touching the failure of the defendant to testify in his own behalf, attributed to the district attorney, although highly reprehensible, were not prejudicial to the defendant, in view of the clear evidence of the defendant’s guilt, and the prompt instruction by the trial judge to the jury to disregard such remarks. All concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
178 A.D. 952, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-rose-nyappdiv-1917.