People v. Rose

917 N.W.2d 670
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided October 2, 2018·No. SC: 156322; COA: 337561·Published

Opinion

On order of the Court, the motion to supplement application is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the July 7, 2017 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). The motion for miscellaneous relief is DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Rose, 917 N.W.2d 670 (Mich. 2018).

917 N.W.2d 670 (People v. Rose) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.