People v. Rosas
130 A.D.3d 757, 11 N.Y.S.3d 872
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Chun, J.), imposed March 18, 2013, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.
Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.
The defendant’s waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 265 [2011]) and, thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim. However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Eng, P.J., Rivera, Hall, Hinds-Radix and Barros, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Rosas, 130 A.D.3d 757, 11 N.Y.S.3d 872 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).
130 A.D.3d 757 (People v. Rosas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Bradshaw
961 N.E.2d 645 (New York Court of Appeals, 2011)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)