People v. Rosas

279 A.D.2d 418, 719 N.Y.S.2d 569, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 635
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Rosas. Read the opinion of the Court — 306 A.D.2d 91

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Beal, J.), rendered March 18, 1999, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 4V2 to 9 years, unanimously affirmed.

The jury’s verdict was supported by legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. The jury’s inability to reach a verdict on the sale count does not warrant a different result (see, People v Rayam, 94 NY2d 557).

The court’s Sandoval ruling balanced the appropriate factors and was a proper exercise of discretion (see, People v Walker, 83 NY2d 455, 458-459; People v Mattiace, 77 NY2d 269, 275-276; People v Pavao, 59 NY2d 282, 292). Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Tom, Ellerin, Rubin and Buckley, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Rosas, 279 A.D.2d 418, 719 N.Y.S.2d 569, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 635 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

279 A.D.2d 418 (People v. Rosas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Rayam
729 N.E.2d 694 (New York Court of Appeals, 2000)
People v. Walker
633 N.E.2d 472 (New York Court of Appeals, 1994)
People v. Pavao
451 N.E.2d 216 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Mattiace
568 N.E.2d 1189 (New York Court of Appeals, 1990)