People v. Rosario

138 A.D.3d 551, 28 N.Y.S.3d 592
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Rosario. Read the opinion of the Court — 132 A.D.3d 454
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 19, 2016·No. 860 73861/10·Published

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Margaret L. Clancy, J., at dismissal motion; Harold Adler, J., at plea and sentencing), rendered September 12, 2012, convicting defendant of disorderly conduct, and sentencing him to five days of community service, unanimously affirmed.

Because defendant waived prosecution by information, the accusatory instrument was only required to satisfy the reasonable cause requirement of a misdemeanor complaint (see People v Dumay, 23 NY3d 518, 522 [2014]). In any event, the superseding information was sufficiently corroborated by supporting depositions that predated it, but referenced the initial information, which contained identical allegations.

Concur — Friedman, J.P., Andrias, Moskowitz, Kapnick and Webber, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Rosario, 138 A.D.3d 551, 28 N.Y.S.3d 592 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

138 A.D.3d 551 (People v. Rosario) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Dumay
16 N.E.3d 1150 (New York Court of Appeals, 2014)