People v. Rosario

41 A.D.3d 620, 836 N.Y.S.2d 417
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Rosario. Read the opinion of the Court — 26 A.D.3d 271

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Honorof, J.), rendered October 5, 2005, convicting him of attempted robbery in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]).

The defendant has raised no nonfrivolous issues in his supplemental pro se brief. The defendant’s waiver of his right to appeal precludes review of his challenges to the court’s denial of that branch of his pretrial motion which was to suppress his statement to the police (see People v Kemp, 94 NY2d 831, 833 [1999]; People v Wager, 34 AD3d 505, 506 [2006]; People v Sanchez, 33 AD3d 633, 634 [2006]). Crane, J.P., Santucci, Florio, Dillon and Balkin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Rosario, 41 A.D.3d 620, 836 N.Y.S.2d 417 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

41 A.D.3d 620 (People v. Rosario) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
People v. Kemp
724 N.E.2d 754 (New York Court of Appeals, 1999)
People v. Gonzalez
393 N.E.2d 987 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)
People v. Sanchez
33 A.D.3d 633 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
People v. Wager
34 A.D.3d 505 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
People v. Paige
54 A.D.2d 631 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)