People v. Rosario

196 A.D.2d 666, 601 N.Y.S.2d 870

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Rosario. Read the opinion of the Court — 186 A.D.2d 598 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided August 30, 1993·Published

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Plug, J.), rendered January 9, 1991, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We find that the Supreme Court properly denied the defendant’s motion to set aside the verdict pursuant to CPL 330.30 (see, People v Lopez, 196 AD2d 664 [decided herewith]).

We also find that the court’s Sandoval ruling was not an improvident exercise of discretion. Sullivan, J. P., Balletta, Lawrence and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We find that the Supreme Court properly denied the defendant’s motion to set aside the verdict pursuant to CPL 330.30 (see, People v Lopez, 196 AD2d 664 [decided herewith]).

We also find that the court’s Sandoval ruling was not an improvident exercise of discretion. Sullivan, J. P., Balletta, Lawrence and Eiber, JJ., concur.

People v. Rosario, 196 A.D.2d 666, 601 N.Y.S.2d 870 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

196 A.D.2d 666 (People v. Rosario) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

People v. Lopez

196 A.D.2d 664 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)

Opinion

Related