People v. Rosario

134 A.D.2d 628, 522 N.Y.S.2d 458, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 50840
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Rosario. Read the opinion of the Court — 127 A.D.2d 209

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Rienzi, J.), rendered May 30, 1986, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Upon the exercise of our factual review power, we reject the defendant’s contention that his guilt of the crimes for which he was convicted was not proven beyond a reasonable doubt, and we find that the verdict was not against the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).

As there were no objections to any of the prosecutor’s comments in summation, any issues with respect thereto are unpreserved for appellate review. However, we note that the alleged errors did not deprive the defendant of a fair trial. [629]*629Finally, the sentence imposed was not excessive. Mollen, P. J., Rubin, Kooper and Sullivan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Rosario, 134 A.D.2d 628, 522 N.Y.S.2d 458, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 50840 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

134 A.D.2d 628 (People v. Rosario) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.