People v. Rosado

265 A.D.2d 349, 696 N.Y.S.2d 698, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9604
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Rosado. Read the opinion of the Court — 244 A.D.2d 772

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kangs County (Marrus, J.), rendered April 10, 1997, convicting him of conspiracy in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Where different inferences can be reasonably drawn from the evidence produced at trial, the question of whether a particular person is an accomplice is a question of fact for the jury (see, People v Cobos, 57 NY2d 798; People v Jeffries, 122 AD2d [350]*350281; People v Tusa, 137 AD2d 151). Here, the court properly so charged, and further instructed the jury that accomplice testimony must be corroborated.

The defendant’s sentence was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80, 86).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. S. Miller, J. P., Sullivan, Altman and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Rosado, 265 A.D.2d 349, 696 N.Y.S.2d 698, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9604 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

265 A.D.2d 349 (People v. Rosado) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Cobos
441 N.E.2d 1106 (New York Court of Appeals, 1982)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
People v. Jeffries
122 A.D.2d 281 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
People v. Tusa
137 A.D.2d 151 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)