People v. Rosado

221 A.D.2d 484, 633 N.Y.S.2d 1018, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11917

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Rosado. Read the opinion of the Court — 214 A.D.2d 375 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 13, 1995·Published

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from two sentences of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Tomei, J.), both imposed September 23, 1994.

Ordered that the sentences are affirmed.

The defendant effectively waived appellate review of his sentences as part of his plea agreement (see, People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273; People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1).

In any event, we have examined the defendant’s contention that the sentences imposed are excessive, and find it to be without merit (see, People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816). Mangano, P. J., Rosenblatt, Copertino, Hart and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from two sentences of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Tomei, J.), both imposed September 23, 1994.

Ordered that the sentences are affirmed.

The defendant effectively waived appellate review of his sentences as part of his plea agreement (see, People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273; People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1).

People v. Rosado, 221 A.D.2d 484, 633 N.Y.S.2d 1018, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11917 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

221 A.D.2d 484 (People v. Rosado) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

People v. Seaberg

541 N.E.2d 1022 (New York Court of Appeals, 1989)

People v. Callahan

80 N.Y.2d 273 (New York Court of Appeals, 1992)

People v. Kazepis

101 A.D.2d 816 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)

Opinion

Related