People v. Rosa-Sanchez
This text of 267 A.D.2d 981 (People v. Rosa-Sanchez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: County Court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion of defendant to vacate his plea of guilty. Defendant’s plea was knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently entered (see, People v McLean, 249 AD2d 981; People v Ortiz, 227 AD2d 902), and the contention of defendant that he did not communicate well with the interpreter is not supported by the record (see, People v Martes, 154 AD2d 946, lv denied 75 NY2d 870). The sentence is neither unduly harsh nor severe. (Appeal from Judgment of Oneida County Court, Donalty, J. — Criminal Sale Controlled Substance, 2nd Degree.) Present — Green, J. P., Lawton, Wisner-, Scudder and Balio, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
267 A.D.2d 981, 700 N.Y.S.2d 906, 701 N.Y.S.2d 191, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13707, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-rosa-sanchez-nyappdiv-1999.