People v. Rosa
Opinion
| People v Rosa |
| 2021 NY Slip Op 05992 |
| Decided on November 3, 2021 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on November 3, 2021 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
LEONARD B. AUSTIN, J.P.
BETSY BARROS
FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY
ANGELA G. IANNACCI, JJ.
2015-03356
(Ind. No. 5302/13)
v
Nathan Rosa, appellant.
Nathan Rosa, Stormville, NY, appellant pro se.
Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove and Keith Dolan of counsel), for respondent.
DECISION & ORDER
Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated October 9, 2019 (People v Rosa, 176 AD3d 878), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered April 15, 2015.
ORDERED that the application is denied.
The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745; People v Stultz, 2 NY3d 277).
AUSTIN, J.P., BARROS, CONNOLLY and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.
ENTER:Maria T. Fasulo
Acting Clerk of the Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
2021 NY Slip Op 05992 (People v. Rosa) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.