People v. Rosa

54 A.D.3d 973, 863 N.Y.S.2d 611
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 23, 2008·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from an amended judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Wong, J.), rendered April 23, 2007, revoking a sentence of probation previously imposed by the same court (Grosso, J.), upon a finding that he violated a condition thereof, upon his admission, and imposing a sentence of imprisonment upon his previous conviction of bail jumping in the second degree.

Ordered that the amended judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]). Fisher, J.E, Lifson, Covello, Balkin and Belen, JJ., concur.

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Dayron Rose, Appellant. [863 NYS2d 611]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Rosa, 54 A.D.3d 973, 863 N.Y.S.2d 611 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

54 A.D.3d 973 (People v. Rosa) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Rosa
54 A.D.3d 973 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)