People v. Rosa

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Rosa

273 A.D.2d 78, 710 N.Y.S.2d 525, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6614

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 13, 2000

StatusPublished

This text of 273 A.D.2d 78 (People v. Rosa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Rosa, 273 A.D.2d 78, 710 N.Y.S.2d 525, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6614 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Martin Marcus, J.), rendered March 27, 1998, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of attempted assault in the first degree (two counts) and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a persistent violent felony offender, to three concurrent terms of 25 years to life, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis upon which to disturb the jury’s determinations concerning credibility. The credible evidence clearly established that defendant fired shots at the police officers.

[79]*79We perceive no abuse of sentencing discretion.

We have considered and rejected defendant’s remaining claims, including those contained in his pro se supplemental brief. Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Nardelli, Ellerin, Andrias and Saxe, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Martin Marcus, J.), rendered March 27, 1998, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of attempted assault in the first degree (two counts) and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a persistent violent felony offender, to three concurrent terms of 25 years to life, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis upon which to disturb the jury’s determinations concerning credibility. The credible evidence clearly established that defendant fired shots at the police officers.

[79]*79We perceive no abuse of sentencing discretion.

We have considered and rejected defendant’s remaining claims, including those contained in his pro se supplemental brief. Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Nardelli, Ellerin, Andrias and Saxe, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

273 A.D.2d 78, 710 N.Y.S.2d 525, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6614, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-rosa-nyappdiv-2000.