People v. Rosa

204 A.D.2d 117, 614 N.Y.S.2d 107, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5111
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Rosa. Read the opinion of the Court — 194 A.D.2d 755

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Joseph A. Cerbone, J.), rendered July 9, 1992, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 6 to 12 years, unanimously affirmed.

[118]*118There is no merit to defendant’s contention that the People failed to disprove that he acted as an agent of the undercover officer in this buy and bust transaction. Viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the People and giving them the benefit of every reasonable inference (People v Malizia, 62 NY2d 755, 757, cert denied 469 US 932), a rational jury could have found that defendant was a seller and not "merely a purchaser doing a favor for a friend” (People v Lam Lek Chong; 45 NY2d 64, 74, cert denied 439 US 935; see, People v Simpson, 85 AD2d 306, 310, citing People v Gonzales, 66 AD2d 828). Concur—Murphy, P. J., Carro, Asch, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Rosa, 204 A.D.2d 117, 614 N.Y.S.2d 107, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5111 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

204 A.D.2d 117 (People v. Rosa) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Lam Lek Chong
379 N.E.2d 200 (New York Court of Appeals, 1978)
People v. Malizia
465 N.E.2d 364 (New York Court of Appeals, 1984)
People v. Gonzales
66 A.D.2d 828 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)
People v. Simpson
85 A.D.2d 306 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)