People v. Rory B.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Rory B.

80 A.D.2d 643, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10346

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 23, 1981

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 80 A.D.2d 643 (People v. Rory B.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Rory B., 80 A.D.2d 643, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10346 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

Opinions

Appeal by defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County, imposed January 18, 1979, upon his conviction of burglary in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, the sentence being an indeterminate term of imprisonment with a maximum of six years. The appeal brings up for review the denial of defendant’s application for youthful offender treatment. Sentence modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, the application for youthful offender treatment is granted, the conviction is vacated, and the sentence is reduced to an [644]*644indeterminate term of imprisonment with a maximum of four years. As so modifie ’, sentence affirmed. Under the facts and circumstances of this case, defendant should have been granted youthful offender treatment and sentenced as indicated. Gulotta, J.P., Hargett and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County, imposed January 18, 1979, upon his conviction of burglary in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, the sentence being an indeterminate term of imprisonment with a maximum of six years. The appeal brings up for review the denial of defendant’s application for youthful offender treatment. Sentence modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, the application for youthful offender treatment is granted, the conviction is vacated, and the sentence is reduced to an [644]*644indeterminate term of imprisonment with a maximum of four years. As so modifie ’, sentence affirmed. Under the facts and circumstances of this case, defendant should have been granted youthful offender treatment and sentenced as indicated. Gulotta, J.P., Hargett and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

80 A.D.2d 643, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10346, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-rory-b-nyappdiv-1981.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack