People v. Rontondi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Rontondi

129 A.D.2d 820, 514 N.Y.S.2d 662, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 45521

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 27, 1987

StatusPublished

This text of 129 A.D.2d 820 (People v. Rontondi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Rontondi, 129 A.D.2d 820, 514 N.Y.S.2d 662, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 45521 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Colabella, J.), rendered March 19, 1985, convicting him of burglary in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s claims with respect to his guilty plea have not been preserved for appellate review (see, People v Pellegrino, 60 NY2d 636). In any event, the record discloses that the plea was the product of a knowing, voluntary and intelligent relinquishment of rights (see, People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9). Finally, the defendant’s sentence, imposed in accordance with the plea agreement, was not unduly harsh or excessive (see, People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816). Mangano, J. P., Bracken, Niehoff, Kooper and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Colabella, J.), rendered March 19, 1985, convicting him of burglary in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s claims with respect to his guilty plea have not been preserved for appellate review (see, People v Pellegrino, 60 NY2d 636). In any event, the record discloses that the plea was the product of a knowing, voluntary and intelligent relinquishment of rights (see, People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9). Finally, the defendant’s sentence, imposed in accordance with the plea agreement, was not unduly harsh or excessive (see, People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816). Mangano, J. P., Bracken, Niehoff, Kooper and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

129 A.D.2d 820, 514 N.Y.S.2d 662, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 45521, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-rontondi-nyappdiv-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack